Why Vitalik Wants DeFi to Move Beyond USDC and the Dollar

Vitalik Buterin argues USDC yield strategies aren't real DeFi, backing algorithmic stablecoins and overcollateralized systems instead.
Soumen Datta
February 9, 2026
Table of Contents
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently criticized popular USDC yield strategies, declaring they don't qualify as genuine Decentralized Finance (DeFi).
In a detailed response to crypto analyst c-node, Buterin argued that simply depositing centralized stablecoins like USDC into lending protocols like Aave fails to meet the core principles of DeFi. Instead, he endorsed algorithmic stablecoins and overcollateralized systems as the path forward for truly decentralized finance.
What Did Vitalik Actually Say About USDC Yield?
Buterin's comments came in response to c-node's assertion that most modern DeFi serves speculative interests rather than advancing decentralized infrastructure. The Ethereum co-founder wrote, "inb4 'muh USDC yield', that's not DeFi," dismissing the practice of earning yield on centralized stablecoins as a legitimate DeFi activity.
He provided two frameworks for what counts as genuine DeFi. The "easy mode" answer focuses on ETH-backed algorithmic stablecoins, where users can transfer counterparty risk to market makers. The "hard mode" answer allows for real-world asset (RWA) backing, but only if the system is overcollateralized and diversified enough to survive any single asset failure.
"Even if 99% of the liquidity is backed by CDP holders who hold negative algo-dollars and separately positive dollars elsewhere, the fact that you have the ability to punt the counterparty risk on the dollars to a market maker is still a big feature," Buterin wrote.
Why Does Overcollateralization Matter?
Overcollateralization serves as a buffer against asset failures. In Buterin's framework, a stablecoin backed by multiple assets qualifies as real DeFi if the overcollateralization ratio exceeds the maximum share of any individual backing asset. This structure distributes risk across multiple collateral types rather than concentrating it in centralized entities.
Collateralized Debt Position (CDP) holders lock up assets to mint stablecoins, creating a market-based mechanism for managing risk. Buterin contrasted this with current USDC strategies, where users deposit a centralized stablecoin into a protocol but gain no reduction in centralized counterparty risk. The underlying asset remains controlled by Circle, making the arrangement fundamentally centralized regardless of the protocol's architecture.
The Ideological Split in DeFi
C-node challenged the crypto sector to rethink what DeFi actually means, arguing that most DeFi users simply want leverage on crypto positions while maintaining self-custody. The analyst called USDC yield strategies "cargo cults" that copy DeFi's form without its substance.
Key points from the debate:
- Early Ethereum participants were ideologically committed to self-custody
- Non-Ethereum chains struggle to replicate ETH's DeFi success
- Venture capital dominates newer ecosystems, prioritizing institutional custody over decentralization
- Market forces may favor self-custody-driven protocols over hybrid systems
Buterin's long-term vision extends beyond current dollar-pegged structures. He advocates for moving away from the dollar as a unit of account toward diversified indices backed by decentralized collateral.
Vitalik Sells 6,183 ETH
The debate emerged days after Buterin sold 6,183 ETH worth approximately $13.24 million over four days. On-chain data from Lookonchain and CoinMarketCap shows he routed the funds through CoW Protocol in small batches at an average price of $2,140 per ETH.
This wasn't a panic sell. On January 30, 2026, Buterin announced he had withdrawn 16,384 ETH (valued at $43-45 million) from his personal holdings to fund projects across finance, communication, governance, blockchains, operating systems, secure hardware, and biotech. He described this as a personal contribution to Ethereum's development goals during a period of "mild austerity" for the Ethereum Foundation.
The first confirmed transaction came on February 2, when a wallet associated with Buterin sold 211.84 ETH for 500,000 USDC. That USDC went directly to Kanro, a biotech organization Buterin founded in 2023 that supports research on COVID-19, future pandemics, global health, AI safety, and open-source projects. According to KuCoin, Kanro has received over $87 million in crypto donations since launch.
Different trackers reported varying totals depending on whether they included wrapped ETH conversions. Lookonchain initially reported 2,961 ETH worth $6.6 million sold over three days. Arkham Intelligence data showed the wallet executing multiple sale orders in batches of 70.313 WETH through CowSwap.
Conclusion
Buterin's critique challenges DeFi projects to prioritize genuine decentralization over superficial yield strategies. His framework requires stablecoins to either use ETH-based collateral or maintain overcollateralization ratios that can withstand individual asset failures.
The debate highlights an ongoing tension between DeFi as a speculative tool and DeFi as a foundational financial system built on self-custody and distributed risk.
Resources
Vitalik Buterin on X: Post on Feb. 9
Vitalik Buterin on X (January 30, 2026): Original announcement of 16,384 ETH withdrawal and multi-year funding plan
CoinDesk: Reporting on Buterin's announcement and Ethereum Foundation's "mild austerity" period
Yahoo Finance (Withdrawal): Coverage of the 16,384 ETH withdrawal and aggregated conversion figures of 13,217-13,220 ETH
Yahoo Finance (700 ETH Sales): Details on 704.84 ETH sold and Kanro transfer via Lookonchain data
Lookonchain on X (February 2, 2026): On-chain tracking of the February 2 Kanro transfer (211.84 ETH for 500,000 USDC)
TradingView / Cointelegraph: Reporting on initial 2,961 ETH sold for $6.6 million via CoW Protocol at $2,228 average
Read Next...
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Vitalik Buterin say about USDC yield?
Vitalik Buterin stated that earning yield by depositing USDC into lending protocols like Aave does not qualify as real DeFi because it relies on centralized stablecoins and fails to reduce counterparty risk.
Are algorithmic stablecoins considered real DeFi?
According to Buterin, yes. Algorithmic stablecoins qualify as genuine DeFi if they are overcollateralized or allow users to transfer counterparty risk to market makers, creating meaningful decentralization benefits.
Why did Vitalik Buterin sell ETH in February 2026?
Buterin sold ETH as part of a planned multi-year deployment of 16,384 ETH to fund projects focused on security, privacy tech, biotech, and AI safety, including donations to Kanro, the biotech organization he founded.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of BSCN. The information provided in this article is for educational and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, or advice of any kind. BSCN assumes no responsibility for any investment decisions made based on the information provided in this article. If you believe that the article should be amended, please reach out to the BSCN team by emailing [email protected].
Author
Soumen DattaSoumen has been a crypto researcher since 2020 and holds a master’s in Physics. His writing and research has been published by publications such as CryptoSlate and DailyCoin, as well as BSCN. His areas of focus include Bitcoin, DeFi, and high-potential altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and Chainlink. He combines analytical depth with journalistic clarity to deliver insights for both newcomers and seasoned crypto readers.
Crypto Project & Token Reviews
Project & Token Reviews
Comprehensive reviews of crypto's most interesting projects and assets
Learn about the hottest projects & tokens


















