WEB3
by BSCN
April 23, 2024
The lawsuit challenges the SEC's Dealer Rule, alleging that it violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by not adhering to a transparent and fair rulemaking process.
Two major blockchain entities, the Blockchain Association (BA) and the Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT), have initiated a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). They filed this legal challenge in the Northern District of Texas.
Their lawsuit addresses what they deem the SEC's misguided regulatory actions against the U.S. digital asset market.
The core of BA and CFAT's legal challenge lies in the SEC's "Dealer Rule." This rule, according to the plaintiffs, violates several aspects of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In February, the SEC redefined what constitutes a "dealer." This new definition extends to any market participant who provides liquidity or acts as a market maker, irrespective of the securities involved.
It specifically targets entities managing at least $50 million in assets. This change notably affects automated market makers and liquidity providers within decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, aligning them with traditional securities dealers.
The plaintiffs argue that the rule's implementation did not undergo a transparent, fair rulemaking process. This has led to unclear regulations that hinder the operation of digital asset industry participants.
The revamped dealer definition has faced significant opposition from within the crypto community and the SEC itself.
Commissioners Hester Pierce and Mark Uyeda criticized the new rule, highlighting its potential overreach and the blurring of lines between dealers and traders. The SEC reportedly adopted this rule following a 3-2 vote, reflecting internal dissent.
“This is the latest example of the SEC’s blatant attempts to unlawfully regulate outside its authority, skirting legal obligations to address the numerous concerns received during its compressed comment period,” wrote Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith in an emailed statement to Unchained.
The lawsuit emphasizes that the SEC failed to address significant issues raised during the rule’s 39-day comment period in 2022.
BA and CFAT argue that the SEC’s expansive interpretation of the term "dealer" contradicts decades of established meaning. They assert that this approach could severely damage the vast network of individuals and businesses involved in digital asset trading.
“The SEC’s unlawful radical expansion bears no resemblance to the long-standing and well-settled meaning of the term, and mandates an approach that will cause irreparable damage to the tens of millions of Americans and businesses who participate in digital asset trading,” Blockchain Association noted in a recent statement.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of BSCNews. The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. BSCNews assumes no responsibility for any investment decisions made based on the information provided in this article
Latest News
November 23, 2024
Weekly Article Recap: 11/18-11/22
November 22, 2024
Gary Gensler’s Departure and Its Impact on Crypto
November 22, 2024
Solana ($SOL) Hits All-Time High of $264: Possible Factors Behind the Surge
November 22, 2024
Trump’s New Crypto Advisory Committee Expected to Create U.S. Bitcoin Reserve: Report
November 21, 2024
Justin Sun Drops $6.2M on Controversial Banana Art, Calls It a "Cultural Phenomenon"
November 21, 2024
Trump’s Team Discusses Potential White House Crypto Role Amid Growing Industry Influence
November 21, 2024
Bitwise Joins Race for Solana ETF Amid Growing Interest in Crypto ETFs
November 20, 2024
Sky Protocol’s Flagship Stablecoin $USDS Expands to Solana