WEB3

DAOs: The Future of Business Innovation or a Legal Minefield for Members?

by BSCN

May 10, 2023

chain

While DAOs offer new democratized ways to operate organizations, their lack of legal recognition and central leadership can expose their members to personal liability for the DAO's actions.

Navigating Legal Liability in DAO

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are becoming increasingly popular in the blockchain community due to their innovative, decentralized structure. With no central leadership, DAOs rely on smart contracts to enforce pre-defined rules, and their members have decision-making authority and community participation. 

While this offers a new democratized way to operate organizations, the lack of central leadership also exposes members to personal liability for the DAO's actions. 

Unlike traditional legal entities, DAO members do not enjoy protection against personal liability unless state law offers such protection. 

In this article, we will explore the legal liability of DAOs and the challenges they face regarding regulatory compliance and a lack of a consistent regulatory framework.

An Overview of DAOs' Legal Standing

There are multiple legal limitations that have prevented DAOs from gaining full mainstream adoption. Let’s look into it:

Inconsistent Regulation

DAOs do not have a consistent regulatory framework. Several DAOs defaulted to partnership status because they are unincorporated, which entails unlimited liability for its members. 

It is common for individuals to remain anonymous when they participate in a DAO. Therefore, AML/KYC compliance is very challenging for a DAO. 

Moreover, DAOs may include individuals from across the world, resulting in multiple jurisdictions' laws being involved. If a dispute arises, figuring out which country's laws apply can be difficult and might lead to lengthy legal battles. 

Due to the limited liability, DAOs also have difficulty raising capital since most investors would avoid risking their assets.

No legal Recognition for DAOs

Almost all states do not recognize DAOs as legal entities, which is one of the biggest obstacles to their adoption. A DAO must be legally recognized to be required to register with the state. 

As a result, DAOs are not entitled to the same corporate privileges as traditional corporations. It also prevents them from entering into commercial contracts, further restricting the types of businesses they can operate.

Risks of Distributed Governance

DAOs generally operate in a decentralized manner with no central authority and are governed through smart contracts. A hacker may be able to manipulate these rules, causing disastrous outcomes.

Benefits of Working With DAOs

Although DAOs remain problematic, they are still a viable legal system. Having a DAO-based structure would be beneficial in a variety of ways.

When compared to existing legal entities, DAOs have greater operational efficiency. One of the benefits of DAOs is that they can quickly pool and deploy capital. In addition, DAOs can automate most business processes when appropriately programmed. 

Image Courtesy: rawpixel (freepik)

By automating the execution of smart contracts, once certain metrics of revenue, realization, and usage have been achieved, profitability can be further improved. For these reasons, some of the world's billionaires have turned to DAOs to grow their wealth and protect it.

It is, however, crucial to do so in a safe and efficient manner. You can achieve this by working with an expert team that understands the technicalities of setting up a DAO and the regulatory concerns involved. 

Smart Contracts and Law

The purpose of DAO development is closely related to the principle of "code is law," which is frequently discussed in blockchain technology. However, even though DAOs have similar organizational structures to today's legal structures, the system has not been regulated by nearly any country. 

In 2016, however, an investor overused the withdrawal rights due to an oversight in the project's coding and disappeared, taking about 40 million dollars. Following the scandal, discussions have emerged about the limits of interpreting the code as law and the necessity of considering the rule of law. Due to this, while "law" is the codified rule in smart contracts, it is crucial that secondary protection is formulated according to DAO principles.

In 2021, Wyoming became the first American state to pass the regulations that will ensure the development and widespread use of DAOs worldwide. As a result, DAOs will have the same legal status as companies and can do all the same business and transactions. The States of Tennessee and Vermont followed Wyoming's lead and adopted similar legislation following its example.

To conclude, DAOs represent a significant shift in how businesses operate, bringing more transparency, efficiency, and democratization to the table. However, their legal status remains uncertain, exposing members to unlimited liability. 

Despite these challenges, DAOs' potential benefits are undeniable, as evidenced by the growing interest of billionaires and investors. 

The key to safely and efficiently joining the DAO revolution is to work with a team of experts who can navigate the technicalities of setting up a DAO and the regulatory concerns that come with it. Only through a consistent regulatory framework and legal certainty can DAOs thrive without being hindered by regulatory inconsistencies and gaps. 

;