Stablecoin Yield Compromise To Advance Clarity Act?

A Long-Running Dispute Nears Resolution

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has taken a step closer to a Senate Banking Committee markup after negotiators struck a deal on one of the bill's most contentious issues: stablecoin yield. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) confirmed they have reached an agreement in principle with White House officials on the stablecoin yield language, the central dispute that had kept the Clarity Act frozen in the Senate Banking Committee since January 2026.

The compromise draws a clear line between activity-based perks and passive income. The deal allows usage-based rewards tied to spending or transacting with stablecoins, but prohibits paying yield on idle balances. The rationale is straightforward: banks have long argued that allowing such rewards could cause people to shift money out of deposits and into stablecoins, reducing the funds available for lending.

The yield question has been a flashpoint ever since the GENIUS Act was signed into law. When Congress passed the GENIUS Act, the measure banned stablecoin issuers from paying any form of interest or yield to holders. But as legislators turned to the broader Clarity Act, a gap came into focus: crypto exchanges, affiliates, or partners could offer yield-like incentives tied to stablecoin holdings, meaning issuers could effectively sidestep the ban through third parties. Banks pushed hard to close that gap in the new bill. The new compromise text bars crypto firms from paying interest or yield on stablecoin balances in a manner economically or functionally equivalent to a bank deposit.

Industry Backing and What Comes Next

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has endorsed the compromise, lending high-profile industry support to a deal that ends months of legislative gridlock. Armstrong posted "Mark it up" after the compromise text was released, while Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal said the language preserves activity-based rewards tied to real participation on crypto platforms. A letter led by the Blockchain Association, signed by more than 125 crypto industry players including Coinbase, Gemini, Kraken, and Ripple, had previously argued against expanding the prohibition on stablecoin rewards. Armstrong's endorsement signals a willingness from at least part of the industry to accept a middle ground in exchange for the broader bill moving forward.

Not everyone is fully satisfied. The Crypto Council for Innovation supported advancing the legislation but flagged that the prohibition is broader than the approach taken in last year's GENIUS Act, applying across all digital asset market participants rather than only issuers. Some stakeholders have said that while the compromise is not ideal, it is sufficient to give the wider bill a chance. The bill goes well beyond stablecoins, setting legal definitions for when a digital asset is a commodity versus a security, regulating custodial arrangements, and establishing exchange registration requirements.

Even with the yield dispute largely resolved, the road ahead is not short. The Senate Banking Committee markup is step one of several sequential stages before the bill reaches the President's desk, with Senate Banking and Agriculture Committee drafts still needing to be reconciled with each other, and then with the House-passed version. Senate Banking is expected to schedule a markup as early as the week of May 11. Separately, Senator Tillis has also pushed for ethics provisions aimed at preventing government officials from profiting from the crypto sector, and language around DeFi and illicit finance remains unresolved.

Sources:
CoinDesk: Crypto industry backs CLARITY Act yield compromise, pushes Senate Banking for markup
CoinDesk: Clarity Act text lets crypto firms offer stablecoin rewards while shielding bank yield
Yahoo Finance: Coinbase Backs CLARITY Act Compromise Banning Passive Stablecoin Yield

Related News:
BSCN: CLARITY Act Got Its Biggest Break Yet: Is Crypto Law Finally Happening?
BSCN: What is the Clarity Act?